How to Get Grant Writing Experience Without Working for Free (A Volunteer Opportunity You'll Actually Enjoy)

Table of Contents

1. The Experience Catch-22 Every New Grant Writer Faces

2. Traditional Paths to Getting Experience

3. A Fresh Approach: Learn Grant Writing by Reviewing Proposals

4. What Is the Unfunded List?

5. Why Reviewing Proposals Makes You a Better Grant Writer

6. How to Get Started

7. FAQ

8. Your Next Step

The Experience Catch-22 Every New Grant Writer Faces

If you've ever searched for grant writing jobs, you've likely noticed the frustrating pattern: nearly every position requires three to four years of experience. But how are you supposed to get experience if no one will hire you without it?

This is the question I hear most often from my students. They've completed their grant writing training, earned their Certificate in Grant Writing, and they're ready to launch their careers. But that experience requirement feels like a locked door with no key in sight.

The good news? There are more ways around this barrier than you might think. And today, I want to share several approaches—including one that might actually be enjoyable rather than feeling like unpaid labor.

Traditional Paths to Getting Grant Writing Experience

Let's start with the paths that already exist. Some of these you've probably heard before, but a few might be new to you. Each has its own advantages and drawbacks, and the right choice depends on your current situation, schedule, and career goals.

Volunteering for Nonprofits to write grants

This is the advice most people give when you ask how to get grant writing experience, and for good reason—it works. The basic approach involves reaching out to small nonprofit organizations, offering to write a grant or two pro bono, and using those completed proposals to build your portfolio.

How it works: You identify a nonprofit whose mission resonates with you, reach out to its executive director or development staff, and offer your services. Ideally, you'll find an organization that has identified funders they want to approach but lacks the capacity to write the proposals themselves. You write the grant, they submit it, and you gain a work sample for your portfolio.

The pros: This path gives you real-world experience writing complete proposals from start to finish. You'll navigate the full process—gathering information from program staff, researching the funder, drafting and revising, and meeting a deadline. If the grant gets funded, you have a compelling success story to share with future employers or clients. You're also building relationships in the nonprofit community, which can lead to paid opportunities down the road.

The cons: This can feel like taking on a second unpaid job, especially when you're already working full-time. Finding the right organization takes effort—you need one that's organized enough to provide you with the information you need but under-resourced enough to genuinely need your help. Some volunteers find themselves chasing down program managers for budget details or waiting weeks for feedback on drafts. The timeline can stretch far longer than anticipated, and if the organization is disorganized, the experience can be frustrating rather than educational.

Resume value: High, especially if you can show funded proposals. Employers and clients want to see that you've written real grants for real organizations. Even unfunded proposals demonstrate your ability to complete the work. Be prepared to discuss what you learned from the experience and how you'd approach things differently next time.

Landing a Position with a Grant Writing Firm That Trains New grant Writers

Some grant writing firms genuinely invest in developing talent from the ground up. Rather than requiring years of experience, they hire promising candidates and provide mentorship, feedback, and gradually increasing responsibility.

How it works: You research grant writing firms in your area or those that work remotely, looking specifically for those with a reputation for training new writers. You apply, interview, and if hired, you typically start with smaller tasks—research, editing, drafting sections of proposals—before taking on full proposals independently. The firm provides oversight, feedback, and quality control while you learn.

The pros: You get paid while you learn. You benefit from structured mentorship and feedback from experienced professionals. You see how a successful grant writing operation runs, learning not just the writing but also client management, project workflow, and business practices. The experience is legitimate employment, not volunteer work, which carries weight on your resume. And you're building professional relationships that can support your career for years to come.

The cons: These positions can be competitive. Firms that invest in training new writers are desirable employers, so you may be up against other candidates with similar qualifications. The pay for entry-level positions may be modest. And not every firm that claims to train new writers actually provides meaningful mentorship—some simply expect you to figure it out on your own while billing clients for your time.

Resume value: Very high. Paid employment at a grant writing firm signals to future employers and clients that someone was willing to stake their reputation and client relationships on your work. It's concrete, verifiable experience that's difficult to question.

How to find these firms: This is exactly why we created our Inside Grant Writing Businesses webinars, held on the first Thursday of each month at 10 am Central Time. Each webinar features a panel of grant-writing firm owners who share how they run their businesses, including how they hire and train new grant writers. You'll hear directly from these firm owners about what they look for in candidates, how they onboard new team members, and whether they're currently hiring. It's the best way to identify firms that genuinely invest in developing new talent versus those that expect you to arrive fully formed. BUTTON [Link to upcoming webinars https://sparkthefiregrantwriting.com/webinars]

Serving on Grant Review Panels for Funders

Many foundations and government agencies recruit community members and professionals to serve on their review panels. This experience puts you on the other side of the table, showing you exactly how funders evaluate proposals and make funding decisions.

How it works: Funders recruit reviewers through various channels—professional associations, community networks, or open calls on their websites. Once selected, you receive training on the funder's priorities and scoring criteria. You're then assigned a set of proposals to review independently, scoring them against the rubric and providing written comments. Many panels also include group discussions where reviewers debate scores and reach consensus on funding recommendations.

The pros: This is arguably the most valuable experience you can gain for understanding what makes proposals succeed or fail. You see dozens of proposals side by side, which quickly reveals patterns—what makes some applications stand out while others fall flat. You learn the specific language and priorities of funders in a way that's impossible to grasp from the outside. You also build relationships with funder staff and fellow reviewers, expanding your professional network.

The cons: These opportunities can be competitive, especially for well-known funders. Government review panels often have specific eligibility requirements—some prefer reviewers from certain geographic areas, professional backgrounds, or demographic groups. The time commitment during review periods can be intense, with tight deadlines for reading and scoring multiple lengthy proposals. And some panels offer only modest stipends or no compensation at all.

Resume value: Extremely high. Being selected as a grant reviewer signals that a funder trusted your judgment to help allocate their resources. It demonstrates insider knowledge of the funding process that most grant writers lack. In interviews, you can speak with authority about what reviewers actually look for because you've been one.

How to find these opportunities: Check with your local community foundation, state arts council, or government agencies that administer federal pass-through funding. Many post reviewer recruitment notices on their websites. Professional associations like the Grant Professionals Association sometimes share these opportunities with members. Once you've served on one panel, you're often invited back or referred to other funders seeking reviewers.

Writing Grants for Your Own Employer

If you're currently working at a nonprofit in a non-grant-writing role, you might already be sitting on an opportunity to build experience without changing jobs.

How it works: You approach your supervisor or executive director and express interest in taking on grant writing responsibilities. This might mean writing a proposal for a small foundation grant, assisting the development director with a larger application, or taking ownership of a recurring grant that comes up for renewal. You incorporate grant writing into your existing role, either formally by changing your job description or informally as a special project.

The pros: You get paid your regular salary while building grant writing experience. You already understand the organization's programs, budget, and culture, which eliminates the learning curve that volunteers face. You have built-in access to program staff and financial information. If your proposals get funded, you're directly contributing to your organization's success, which can lead to recognition, raises, or promotions. And you can speak to this experience as paid employment, not volunteer work.

The cons: Not every employer will say yes. Some may worry about pulling you away from your primary responsibilities. Others may have existing staff who handle grants and don't want to share the territory. The quality of mentorship varies—if no one in your organization has strong grant writing skills, you may be learning through trial and error rather than guidance. And if your organization has a troubled relationship with funders or a weak track record, it may be harder to achieve funding success.

Resume value: High. This is paid professional experience within an organization, which employers respect. You can point to specific grants you wrote, dollars raised, and programs funded. The experience also demonstrates initiative—you identified a need and stepped up to fill it.

How to approach the conversation: Frame your request around organizational benefit, not just your own career development. Come prepared with specific grant opportunities you've identified, a realistic timeline, and a plan for balancing grant writing with your current duties. Offer to start small with a single proposal before taking on more.

Subcontracting with Established Grant Writers

Some experienced grant writers take on more work than they can handle and look for trained writers to assist with various tasks. This arrangement lets you learn from a mentor while building your portfolio.

How it works: You connect with established freelance grant writers or small firms and offer to assist with their overflow work. This might include conducting prospect research, gathering data for needs statements, drafting sections of proposals, editing and proofreading, or formatting final submissions. As trust builds, you may take on larger portions of proposals or eventually full projects under the lead writer's supervision.

The pros: You learn directly from someone who's already successful in the field. You see how experienced professionals approach projects, manage client relationships, and solve problems. The work is often paid, even if at a lower rate than you'd earn independently. You build a relationship with someone who can refer clients to you, provide references, and offer ongoing mentorship. And you gain work samples without having to find your own clients.

The cons: Finding these opportunities requires networking and relationship-building—established writers won't hire you if they don't know you exist. The pay for subcontract work may be modest, especially when you're starting out. The work may be behind the scenes, meaning you can't always claim public credit for proposals you helped write. And quality varies—some lead writers are generous mentors while others simply want cheap labor.

Resume value: Moderate to high, depending on how you frame it. You can describe the types of proposals you worked on, the role you played, and the outcomes. Be honest about your level of contribution—saying you "assisted with" a proposal is different from saying you "wrote" it. If the lead writer is willing to serve as a reference, that adds significant credibility.

How to find these opportunities: Attend conferences and professional association meetings where grant writers gather. Join online communities and LinkedIn groups for grant professionals. Reach out directly to freelancers whose work you admire, introducing yourself and expressing interest in supporting their projects. The Grant Professionals Association is an excellent network for making these connections.

Pro Bono grant writing Work Through Organized Programs

Organizations like Catchafire and VolunteerMatch connect skilled volunteers with nonprofits seeking specific help, including grant writing. These platforms remove some of the friction from traditional volunteering by handling the matching process.

How it works: You create a profile on the platform, listing your skills and availability. Nonprofits post projects they need help with, including grant writing. The platform matches you with opportunities that fit your profile, or you browse and apply to projects that interest you. Once matched, you work directly with the nonprofit to complete the project within a defined scope and timeline.

The pros: The matching process is streamlined—you don't have to cold-call dozens of nonprofits hoping to find one that needs help. Projects are typically scoped with clear deliverables and timelines, which helps prevent the indefinite commitment creep that can happen with informal volunteering. The platforms often provide structure and accountability that benefits both volunteers and nonprofits. You can browse opportunities from anywhere, making it possible to find projects that match your interests even if local options are limited.

The cons: Popular opportunities can be competitive, with multiple volunteers applying for the same project. The scope defined on the platform may not match reality once you start working with the nonprofit. And because these platforms serve many types of skill-based volunteering, the volume of grant writing opportunities specifically may be limited depending on when you're looking.

Resume value: Moderate to high. Completing projects through these platforms demonstrates your ability to deliver results in a professional context. You can describe the projects, the organizations you helped, and the outcomes. Some platforms provide verification or badges that confirm your completed work.

Which platforms to try: Catchafire is specifically designed for skill-based volunteering and has a strong focus on nonprofit capacity building. VolunteerMatch is a broader platform with a wider range of opportunities. Taproot Foundation is another option that connects professionals with pro bono consulting projects, though grant writing opportunities may be less frequent.

Internal Grants at Your Workplace

Some large employers—including hospitals, universities, government agencies, and corporations—have internal grant programs or mini-grant competitions. Writing applications for these internal funding opportunities can build your skills in a lower-stakes environment.

How it works: Your employer allocates funding for internal projects and invites employees or departments to apply. These might be innovation grants, professional development funds, community engagement projects, or research seed funding. You write an application following the internal guidelines, your proposal is reviewed by a committee, and funding is awarded to selected projects.

The pros: The stakes are lower than external grant writing. You're working within a familiar environment with colleagues who can provide feedback and guidance. The application process often mirrors external grantmaking, giving you practice with needs statements, objectives, budgets, and evaluation plans. If your proposal is funded, you have a success story to share. And you're demonstrating initiative and leadership to your employer.

The cons: Not all employers have these programs. Internal grants are typically smaller in scope than external foundation or government grants, so the experience may not fully translate. The competition may be internal rather than open, which provides less insight into how external funders evaluate proposals. And the process may be less rigorous than external grantmaking, offering fewer learning opportunities.

Resume value: Moderate. This experience shows initiative and basic grant writing competence, but employers evaluating your candidacy for grant writing positions will likely want to see external grants as well. Frame internal grants as part of your learning journey rather than the entirety of your experience.

How to find these opportunities: Check your employer's intranet for funding announcements. Talk to colleagues in research administration, employee engagement, or corporate social responsibility departments. If your employer doesn't have formal internal grants, there may still be discretionary funds that managers can allocate—making a compelling case for a project you want to pursue is grant writing practice in itself.

Writing Grants for Your Local School or Fire Department

Sometimes the best place to start building experience is right in your own community. Local schools and fire departments frequently need grant funding but often lack dedicated staff to pursue it. These grants tend to be smaller and more straightforward than complex federal applications, making them ideal for new grant writers looking to build confidence and rack up some early wins.

How it works: You reach out to a local school principal, teacher, or fire chief and offer to help them apply for grants. For schools, this might mean helping an individual teacher apply for a classroom grant from organizations such as the American Association of Educators Classroom Grants, Fund for Teachers, the American Association of School Librarians Innovative Reading Grant, Dollar General Summer Literacy Grant, DonorsChoose, or local education foundations. For fire departments, you might pursue equipment grants from FEMA's Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program, Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation, or state-level emergency services funding. You gather the necessary information, write the proposal, and support them through submission.

The pros: These grants often have simpler applications and shorter turnaround times than large foundation or government grants, so you can complete projects quickly and see results faster. You may have a personal connection to the outcome—if your kids attend the school or you live in the fire district, you directly benefit from the funded programs. Teachers and fire chiefs are often deeply grateful for the help, which can lead to enthusiastic references and word-of-mouth referrals. And because these are real grants with real funding attached, any wins go straight into your portfolio as concrete evidence of your abilities.

The cons: The grant amounts are typically smaller, so you won't be able to claim you've secured six-figure funding through this path alone. Some school districts have policies about who can submit grants on their behalf, so you may need to navigate bureaucratic approval. And while the applications are simpler, you'll still need access to information like budgets, program descriptions, and organizational data, which requires cooperation from busy educators or first responders.

Resume value: Moderate to high for entry-level positions. Funded classroom or equipment grants demonstrate that you can identify opportunities, write winning proposals, and deliver results. Employers understand that everyone starts somewhere, and showing initiative in your own community reflects well on your character and commitment. As you build experience, these early wins become part of a larger story of growth.

How to get started: If you have children in school, start by talking to their teachers about whether they've considered applying for classroom grants. Many teachers know these opportunities exist, but don't have time to pursue them. For fire departments, contact your local station and ask to speak with whoever handles grants or administrative matters—in smaller departments, this is often the fire chief directly. Come prepared with a few specific grant opportunities you've researched so they can see you're serious and informed.

---

But here's an option that combines the accessibility of volunteering with a genuinely engaging learning experience—one that feels less like unpaid work and more like professional development.

A Fresh Approach: Learn Grant Writing by Reviewing Proposals

What if instead of writing grants for free, you could learn by reviewing them?

Think about it. When you review someone else's proposal, you see what works and what doesn't. You notice where the narrative loses momentum, where the budget doesn't quite align with the activities, and where the need statement falls flat. You develop the critical eye that separates competent grant writers from exceptional ones.

This is exactly the opportunity that the Unfunded List provides.

What Is the Unfunded List?

The Unfunded List is a 501(c)(3) organization that has been providing constructive feedback to grantseekers since 2015. They've reviewed more than 1,500 proposals from organizations around the world, helping nonprofits strengthen their applications and increase their fundraising success.

Here's a statistic that caught my attention: nonprofits that go through their review program raise over twice as much funding within five years on average. That tells me the feedback they provide is substantive and actionable.

The organization relies on volunteer reviewers to make this work happen. And that's where the opportunity lies for aspiring grant writers.

Why Reviewing Grant Proposals Makes You a Better Grant Writer

When you volunteer as a proposal reviewer with the Unfunded List, you're not just padding your resume. You're developing skills that will serve you throughout your grant writing career.

You learn to identify weak spots

Reading proposals with a critical eye trains you to recognize common mistakes, from vague objectives to unsupported budget line items. Once you can spot these issues in others' work, you become better at avoiding them in your own.

You see a variety of grant writing approaches

Reviewing multiple proposals exposes you to different writing styles, organizational structures, and ways of presenting information. This breadth of exposure accelerates your learning far beyond what you'd gain from writing one or two proposals on your own.

You practice giving constructive feedback

The ability to articulate what's working and what needs improvement is valuable whether you're reviewing a colleague's draft, responding to funder feedback, or mentoring new grant writers down the road.

You build legitimate grant writing experience

When you can tell a potential employer or client that you've reviewed dozens of real grant proposals, you demonstrate both knowledge and commitment to the field.

You contribute to something meaningful

Unlike some volunteer opportunities that feel like busywork, helping organizations improve their proposals has real impact. Better proposals mean more funded programs, which in turn mean more communities served.

How to Get Started

Getting involved with the Unfunded List is straightforward.

To volunteer as a proposal reviewer, sign up here:

If you have questions or want to learn more, you can reach out to Dave Moss directly through their website.

FAQ

What is the best way to learn how to write grants before I start getting experience?

Enroll in the Spark the Fire Certificate in Grant Writing course, rated as the top grant writing education program in the nation for four consecutive years. You'll build a strong foundation in grant writing fundamentals so you can approach any of these experience-building paths with confidence.

Do I need grant writing experience to volunteer as a reviewer?

The Unfunded List welcomes reviewers at various experience levels. The key is a willingness to provide thoughtful, constructive feedback. If you've completed grant writing training and understand the fundamentals of what makes a strong proposal, you have enough foundation to contribute meaningfully.

How much time does reviewing grant proposals require?

Time commitments vary depending on the review round and how many proposals you choose to review. The organization works with volunteers to find a level of involvement that fits their schedules.

Will this count as professional grant writing experience on my resume?

Yes. Volunteer experience is legitimate experience, especially when it involves substantive work like reviewing grant proposals. You can list this on your resume and speak to it in interviews, describing what you learned and how many proposals you reviewed.

Is this only for people who want to become grant writers?

Not at all. Nonprofit staff who submit grant applications can also benefit from understanding what reviewers look for. Development directors, program managers, and executive directors would all gain valuable perspective from this experience.

How is this different from serving on a grant review panel for a funder?

Funder review panels are excellent experience but can be competitive to join and may have specific eligibility requirements. The Unfunded List offers a more accessible entry point, though the learning benefits are similar.

Can I do this while working full-time?

Absolutely. Many volunteers balance reviewing with other professional commitments. Because you're reviewing proposals rather than writing them, you have more flexibility in when and how you complete the work.

Your Next Step

Building grant writing experience doesn't have to mean years of unpaid labor or waiting for the perfect job to materialize. Whether you subcontract with an established writer, propose taking on grants at your current job, or volunteer as a reviewer with the Unfunded List, there are paths forward that fit different schedules and circumstances.

If you're ready to take action, sign up to volunteer as a reviewer today. And if you want to explore the firm route, join us for our next Inside Grant Writing webinar on the first Thursday of the month, where you'll hear directly from firm owners about what they look for when hiring new grant writers.

About the Author

Allison Jones, CEO and Founder of Spark the Fire Grant Writing Classes, LLC, built one of the highest-rated grant writing education programs in the world, recognized for four consecutive years. She holds the Grant Professional Certified (GPC) credential, is one of only 30 nationally approved trainers by the Grant Professionals Certification Institute, and has trained over 5,000 grant writers. Her book Meaningful Work is forthcoming in 2026.

Your Turn! Reply and Comment

👉 Now I'm curious—what's been your biggest challenge in gaining grant writing experience? Have you tried any of these paths, and if so, what worked or didn't work for you? Share your experience in the comments below.

Want more grant writing tips delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the Spark the Fire Newsletter.

Lifting Each Other Up: Building a Stronger Grant Writing Community

Last week, I received a call from someone who'd been referred by another grant writer. The caller had developed what he described as a "supercomputer that could scale up businesses fast" and was looking for help—though it wasn't entirely clear whether he needed a grant writer, a strategist, or something else entirely.

As he tried to explain his technology, I could hear his growing frustration. From his perspective, I just wasn't "getting it." The product sounded impressive in theory, but when I asked practical questions about applications and target markets, the answers got vague. Since for-profit grants aren't my specialty, I listened politely, thinking I might be able to refer him to someone with that expertise.

But the more he talked, the more familiar this conversation became. Here was someone with sophisticated technology—and genuine passion for what he'd built—but no clear understanding of how it solved real problems for real people. He wanted me to be impressed by the innovation itself, rather than its practical application.

His frustration seemed to stem from the fact that he had a solution looking for a problem, and he expected that I could somehow wave a magic wand to bridge that gap for him.

Sound familiar? We're seeing this same pattern more and more with technology companies targeting our profession. They develop impressive-sounding AI tools or databases promising to revolutionize grant writing, but when you dig deeper, it becomes clear they don't really understand how our work actually functions.

Building Each Other Up Through Action

But here's what I love about our profession: we know how to ask the right questions. We're skilled at digging deeper, evaluating claims, and making informed decisions. Of course we are—we're grant professionals! Research is literally what we do for a living. And we don't do it alone—we support each other through the process.

Take that phone call I mentioned. The referral came from a colleague who thought I might be able to help, even though it wasn't ultimately a fit. When I realized it wasn't my expertise, I listened anyway, hoping to connect him with someone better suited. That's what we do—we lift each other up and share opportunities.

This collaborative spirit shows up everywhere in our work. Just last month, a grant writing firm reached out asking if I had any new graduates to recommend. I did! But their question got me thinking—wouldn't it be valuable for our community to learn more about how grant writing firms operate? I quickly pulled together a webinar, and three firms jumped in to participate. The response was incredible, and we all learned something new about different business models in our field.

I see this same supportive energy when I recommend tools that are genuinely helping our profession. I love championing Grant Frog, new software built by fellow grant writer Hannah Wiginton, because she's created something practical while bringing humor and positivity to everything she does. I'm equally enthusiastic about partners like Instrumentl, whose prospect research tools have consistently delivered results for my clients and who've been genuinely collaborative to work with.

This is how our profession grows stronger—through genuine support, shared knowledge, and celebrating each other's successes rather than competing destructively.

Navigating New Technology Together

As more technology solutions emerge targeting our profession, this research expertise becomes even more valuable. We're seeing an explosion of AI-powered tools and databases promising to revolutionize grant writing, and our natural instinct to dig deeper serves us well.

The key questions we ask haven't changed: What problem does this actually solve? How does it work? What are the costs—not just financial, but in terms of professional relationships and ethics? Who benefits, and how? And here's a crucial one: Do they have grant professionals on staff from the start? Better yet, several with varying perspectives?

These aren't hostile questions—they're professional due diligence. When a new service launches, it's perfectly reasonable to ask about their business model, their data sources, their track record, and how they align with our professional standards. Companies that are genuinely committed to serving our profession should welcome these questions and answer them transparently.

I've noticed that the most successful technology partnerships in our field come from companies that take time to understand our work before trying to improve it. Take Instrumentl, for example—they regularly ask grant writers to weigh in on new features and treat us as the experts we are. They recognize that we're not just users—we're professional partners who bring valuable expertise to the relationship.

When we evaluate these tools collectively—sharing experiences in forums, discussing pros and cons at conferences, and asking the hard questions together—we make better decisions for ourselves and our clients. Our shared professional judgment is one of our greatest assets.

Professional Ethics and Trust

All of this collaborative evaluation happens most effectively when we have strong ethical foundations to guide us. The Grant Professionals Association's standards aren't just guidelines—they're our professional compass, helping us navigate complex decisions about partnerships, tools, and business practices.

I'm particularly encouraged by GPA's commitment to evolving and strengthening these ethical guidelines. The organization's responsiveness to our profession's changing needs shows real leadership. When new challenges emerge—whether from technology, business models, or industry practices—GPA continues to refine its guidance to serve us better.

This is also why I pursued and obtained my GPC (Grant Professional Certified) credential this year. Did I need it after years in this profession? Not technically. But literally anyone can hang out a shingle and call themselves a grant writer. It's only through this kind of certification that we maintain our standards and distinguish between true professionals and those who have no idea what they're doing. The credential represents a commitment to ongoing education, ethical practice, and professional accountability.

But ethics standards only work when we have safe spaces to discuss them openly. Professional dialogue requires trust and confidentiality. We need to be able to ask difficult questions, share concerns, and seek guidance without fear that our private communications will be forwarded or used against us.

The strongest professional communities are built on this foundation of trust—where members can engage in good-faith discussions about challenges, share experiences honestly, and support each other through complex decisions. When that trust is respected, we all benefit from shared wisdom and collective problem-solving.

Transparency in Professional Relationships

This foundation of trust extends to how we handle business relationships within our professional community. Transparency isn't just good ethics—it's good business. When we're open about our partnerships, affiliate relationships, business models, and potential conflicts of interest, we strengthen rather than undermine our professional credibility.

I'm always upfront when I recommend tools I use and believe in, like Instrumentl or Grant Frog. If I'm genuinely enthusiastic about something because it works well, I explain why. This transparency allows my colleagues to evaluate my recommendations appropriately and builds trust over time.

The same principle applies to any service provider in our space. Companies that are transparent about how they operate, who they partner with, and how they generate revenue make it easier for grant professionals to make informed decisions. Those who are secretive, evasive, or defensive about legitimate professional questions raise red flags.

We have a right to know if someone promoting a service has a financial stake in it. We have a right to understand business models that might affect our work or our clients. We have a right to ask these questions without facing legal threats or professional retaliation.

When transparency is the norm, everyone benefits. Grant professionals make better decisions, ethical companies thrive, and our entire profession maintains its integrity and trustworthiness.

Choosing to Lift Up, Not Tear Down

How we handle disagreements and challenges says everything about our professional character. I've noticed some practitioners in our field take a different approach—building themselves up by putting competitors down, even naming them specifically when comparing grant training services or approaches. But I believe we're stronger when we focus on lifting each other up instead of tearing each other down.

So what does lifting each other up look like in practice? It means celebrating colleagues' successes genuinely. When someone launches a new service, wins a major grant, or achieves a professional milestone, we cheer them on. It means sharing opportunities—like when that firm called looking for new graduates, or when I see a perfect job posting for someone's skill set.

It means offering constructive feedback when asked, and giving credit where it's due. Most importantly, it means responding to challenges with grace and professionalism. There's not one grant writing class that is the best fit for everyone, and I'm truly impressed with some of the new things that my colleagues are coming up with to make their work more sustainable while also helping people learn grants. That's my lane, my passion, and I love seeing the creativity and innovation happening in grant writing education. When students want to deep dive into federal grants, I refer them to Diane Leonard's federal grant training because that's her expertise.

“The grant writing world is big enough for all of us to succeed—when we focus on serving our clients excellently and supporting our colleagues generously. ”

— Allison Jones, Spark the Fire

The grant writing world is big enough for all of us to succeed—when we focus on serving our clients excellently and supporting our colleagues generously. Amanda Pearce at Funding for Good is exceptional at uplifting others. She even has a conference for grant consultants and a great Boot Camp program—and no, I'm not a business affiliate, I just genuinely like what she's doing.

Moving Forward Together

As our profession continues to evolve, we have incredible opportunities ahead of us. New technologies will emerge, business models will shift, and fresh challenges will test our professional standards. But I'm optimistic about our future because I see how we support each other every day.

And if you're a tech company out there genuinely looking to solve problems in our field, here are some real issues that need addressing: We need common grant applications—or at least standardized sections—so we don't have to retype basic organizational information dozens of times. We need grant applications available in advance in Google Docs and MS Word formats—not PDFs—so we can draft them on our desktops first. We need clear, consistent instructions from funders.

Notice what these have in common? They're all about grantmakers improving their processes, not grant professionals needing AI assistance. Grant professionals know what we're doing—especially if they take quality training, like ours at Spark the Fire. It's not that we need AI to find grant prospects for us; we need foundations to get clearer about what they want to fund. It's not that we need AI to help us write grant applications; we need grantmakers to streamline their questions and requirements.

“It’s not that we need AI to find grant prospects for us; we need foundations to get clearer about what they want to fund. It’s not that we need AI to help us write grant applications; we need grantmakers to streamline their questions and requirements.”

— Allison Jones, Spark the Fire

We're a profession built on research, relationship-building, and service to our communities. These core strengths serve us well whether we're evaluating a new AI tool, mentoring a colleague, or navigating industry changes. When we stay true to these values—asking good questions, maintaining transparency, and lifting each other up—we create a professional environment where everyone can thrive.

The conversations we have in forums, at conferences, and in informal networks shape our profession's future. Every time we choose collaboration over competition, transparency over secrecy, and professional growth over personal attacks, we strengthen the entire grant writing community.

I'm committed to continuing this work—through my teaching, my writing, and my daily interactions with colleagues. Whether you're just starting your grant writing journey or you're a seasoned professional exploring new directions, there's a place for you in this supportive community.

Together, we can ensure that grant writing remains a profession marked by integrity, excellence, and genuine care for the causes we serve.