Why 2026 is the Year to Stop Writing Grant Proposals to Every Foundation

Have you noticed that more and more foundations are moving to "no unsolicited proposals" policies? You research a foundation that looks like a perfect fit for your organization, only to discover that it only accepts proposals by invitation.

It's not your imagination. The door to foundation funding has been closing slowly for years—and the data proves it. 

In 2011, 60% of foundations didn't accept unsolicited proposals (Smith, 2011). By 2015, that number jumped to 72% (Eisenberg, 2015). According to Candid's most recent research analyzing over 112,000 private foundations, 71% now only fund "pre-selected charitable organizations" (Candid, 2024).

That means only 29% of foundations will even look at your proposal unless they've invited you to apply. But 2026 might be the year that the remaining door slams shut for good—and sloppy AI is the reason.

Foundations are already overwhelmed. With AI making it easier than ever to churn out generic grant proposals, program officers are drowning in poorly-written applications using the outdated spray-and-pray method. According to Candid's 2024 Foundation Giving Forecast Survey, 23% of foundations already won't accept AI-generated proposals, and 67% are still figuring out their policies (Mika, 2024). This was an anonymous survey, which allowed foundations to be more candid about their concerns—most haven't made public statements about AI policies yet, so this data reveals what's happening behind the scenes.

Translation: Those foundations that still accept unsolicited proposals are one bad grant cycle away from going invitation-only permanently.

And if you're still using spray-and-pray—sending generic proposals to every foundation you find—you're not just wasting your time. You're actively contributing to the problem that's closing doors for everyone.

The Spray-And-Pray Era Is Over

You know the drill: Research 50 foundations, send essentially the same proposal to all of them, hope for the best.

Here's the thing—it never really worked. But now? It's actively harmful.

Here's what's happening behind the scenes:

Foundation program officers are receiving more proposals than ever. Many are clearly mass-produced. Some are obviously AI-generated by people who don't understand grant writing fundamentals. The quality is declining while the volume is increasing.

The foundation's response? Close the door. No more unsolicited proposals. Invitation only. By the time you realize that perfect-fit foundation has gone invitation-only, you've already lost your chance.

The Real Problem Isn't AI—It's Inexperience

Let me be clear: The problem isn't AI itself. The problem is using AI to write grant applications when you don't have the experience to know whether AI is doing it right.

 Think about it: If you don't understand what makes a compelling needs statement, how will you know if the AI-generated needs statement is compelling? If you can't identify a good organizational fit for grant funding, how will you evaluate whether AI matched you with the right funders?

Learn grant writing first. Master strategic thinking, understand what makes proposals fundable, and develop your judgment about fit and quality. Then use AI to make your work more efficient. AI can help you write faster, generate first drafts, and organize information—but only if you have the grant writing expertise to direct it and evaluate its output.

How Foundations Spot Sloppy Ai Proposals (Hint: Not Through Detectors)

 You might be wondering: Are foundations using AI detection software to screen out AI-generated proposals? The short answer is no, and they don't need to. AI detectors don't work reliably, producing high rates of false positives and false negatives. They flag human-written content as AI-generated and miss obvious AI content. Even the companies that make these tools acknowledge their limitations. But here's the thing: foundations don't need detection software to spot poorly-written AI proposals. The problems with sloppy AI grant writing are obvious to any experienced grant reviewer, not because they "sound like AI" but because they lack the substance, specificity, and strategic thinking that characterize strong proposals.

Bad AI proposals reveal themselves through lack of substance:

• Flowery statements without evidence: "Our innovative, transformative program creates lasting change in the community," → but no data on how many people served, what outcomes were achieved, or what "transformative" actually means

• Generic descriptions that could apply to anyone: Any youth development organization could claim the same things, any food bank could use the same language 

• Buzzword soup without specifics: Talking about "strategic partnerships" and "collaborative impact" without naming a single partner or describing what the collaboration actually looks like 

• Perfect grammar, disconnected logic: Beautiful sentences that don't actually connect to each other or build a coherent argument

• Misunderstanding the funder's actual priorities: The AI matched keywords, but the proposal shows the applicant doesn't really understand what the foundation cares about

• Overpromising without realistic plans: Grand claims about impact that don't match the organization's budget, staffing, or track record

The tell isn't that it "sounds like AI"—it's that it lacks the authentic details, specific evidence, and strategic understanding that only comes from someone who truly knows both the organization and grant writing.

A proposal written by an experienced grant writer using AI thoughtfully? It still has those specifics, that evidence, that strategic fit assessment. Because the human knows what details matter and how to direct the AI to strengthen (not replace) their expertise.

The Strategic Alternative: Quality Over Quantity

 So if spray-and-pray is dead, what's the alternative? 

Strategic grant writing. And it starts with one critical skill: knowing when NOT to apply.

This might sound counterintuitive. You need funding, so shouldn't you cast the widest net possible? Actually, no. That approach wastes your limited time and contributes to the problem that's shutting down access for everyone. Instead, you need to become ruthlessly strategic about where you invest your grant prospecting effort.

Focus on Low-Hanging Fruit First

Low-hanging fruit doesn't mean "easy grants that everyone wins." It means perfect fit funders—foundations where the alignment between your work and their priorities is so clear that your proposal practically writes itself.

What does a perfect fit look like? Start with mission alignment. The foundation funds exactly the kind of work you do—not tangentially related, not sort of similar, but directly aligned. If you run an environmental education program for youth, you're looking for foundations that specifically fund environmental education for youth, not just "youth programs" or "environmental causes" broadly.

Geographic alignment matters too. You need to be squarely in their funding area. If a foundation focuses on three specific counties and you're in one of them, that's a good fit. If they fund the entire Pacific Northwest and you're in Seattle, you're competing with hundreds of other organizations. Be honest about whether you're in the sweet spot or on the periphery.

Grant size alignment is equally important. If you need $50,000 and a foundation typically gives $5,000 grants, you're not a fit—no matter how perfect the mission match. Look at their grantmaking history using tools like Candid's Foundation Directory. What's their typical range? Do they ever make grants at your level? Don't waste time trying to convince a small family foundation to make their largest grant ever to your organization. 

Finally, look at their history of funding organizations like yours. When you review their past grantees, can you genuinely say "of course—we should be on that list too"? That's what I call the "of course" factor.

Getting to "Of Course"

The "of course" factor is that moment when a grant reviewer reads your proposal and thinks "of course that makes sense" and "of course we want to fund that." You've achieved a strategic fit so clear that funding feels obvious. 

Getting to "of course" requires deep research. You need to understand what the foundation values, not just what they say they fund. Read their annual reports. Study the organizations they support. Look for patterns in who gets funding and why. What do their grantees have in common? What kinds of projects do they prioritize—pilot programs or proven models? Direct service or capacity building? Local grassroots organizations or regional powerhouses?

When you can see yourself clearly in that pattern of funding, you've found low-hanging fruit. These are the opportunities where you should spend 80% of your grant writing time. Perfect the proposal. Build the relationship. Demonstrate the fit. These are your highest probability opportunities, and they deserve your best effort.

Long-Shots Can Work—But Only With Strategy

I'm not saying you should never pursue a foundation that's a less obvious fit. Long shots aren't impossible. But they require a fundamentally different approach than spray-and-pray.

A legitimate long-shot means you've identified a genuine strategic connection that might not be obvious at first glance, and you're willing to invest significant time proving it. Maybe the foundation primarily funds healthcare, but they've shown interest in addressing social determinants of health, and your housing stability program directly impacts health outcomes. That's a strategic long-shot—there's a real connection, but you need to make the case.

What makes a long shot worth pursuing? You need a clear, compelling angle for how your work fits their mission, even if your project doesn't look exactly like what they typically fund. You need to be willing to build the relationship first—attending their events, engaging with their published research, and making personal connections with staff or board members. And you need to go all-in on the application itself. Don't submit a recycled proposal with minor tweaks and hope for the best. If you're going after a long shot, treat it like the long shot it is: invest the time to craft a proposal that explicitly makes the strategic connection clear.

Don't apply to long-shots as a numbers game, hoping that if you submit to enough "maybes," a few will pay off. That's just spray-and-pray with better targeting. Apply to long-shots only when you've done the strategic thinking, and you're prepared to do the work.

The Middle Ground: Be Selective

Then there are mid-range opportunities—foundations where you have good but not perfect alignment. Maybe your geographic area overlaps with theirs, but it isn't their primary focus. Maybe your mission connects to theirs tangentially. Maybe they fund your issue area, but usually support larger organizations.

 These require judgment. Some are worth pursuing. Many aren't. The question to ask yourself: Can you genuinely demonstrate fit, or are you just checking boxes? If you're writing a proposal, thinking "well, we kind of fit because..." stop. That's not strategic. That's spray-and-pray disguised as research.

Be selective. Choose the opportunities where you can make a clear, honest case for why you belong in their funding portfolio. Skip the rest.

The Hidden Costs Of Spray-And-Pray

Beyond wasting your time, the spray-and-pray approach to grant writing has real consequences:

Reputational damage: Foundations talk to each other. Submit poorly-matched proposals consistently, and you develop a reputation as someone who doesn't do their homework. In the tight-knit world of philanthropy, that reputation follows you.

Opportunity cost: Every hour spent on a bad-fit proposal is an hour not spent on a good-fit opportunity. If you can write 5 excellent, strategic proposals or 20 mediocre, generic ones, which will raise more money? The data from the Grant Professionals Association shows that grant professionals are already being more selective—writing a median of 19-20 proposals per year, not 50 or 100 (Grant Professionals Association, 2023). Quality matters more than quantity.

Contributing to the problem: Every generic, poorly-matched proposal that lands in a program officer's inbox makes them more likely to close the door to unsolicited applications entirely. You're not just hurting your own chances—you're making it harder for every nonprofit organization.

Diminishing access for everyone: When foundations go invitation-only because they're overwhelmed with poor applications, you've just made it harder for every nonprofit—including yours—to access foundation funding in the future. This particularly impacts smaller organizations and those serving marginalized communities who have fewer insider connections.

What This Means For 2026

The data is clear: Foundations have been moving toward invitation-only policies for over a decade. AI hasn't created this trend—but sloppy use of AI is accelerating it.

In 2026, the strategic grant writers will thrive.

They'll focus on fit, build relationships, and demonstrate an authentic understanding of both their organizations and their funders. They'll use AI as a tool to enhance their expertise, not replace it. They'll invest in professional grant writing training to develop the judgment needed to evaluate quality.

The spray-and-pray crowd will find fewer and fewer doors open.

Which side of that divide do you want to be on?

What You Can Do Right Now

1. Audit your current prospect list. Remove any foundation where you can't clearly articulate why you're a strong fit. If you're using a prospect tracking spreadsheet, add a "fit score" column and be honest about each opportunity.

2. Research thoroughly before applying. Look at 3-5 years of past grantees using resources like Instrumentl, Candid, or foundation 990-PF forms. Can you genuinely say, "Of course, we belong on this list"? If not, move on.

3. Invest in learning. If you're using AI to write proposals, make sure you have the grant writing expertise to evaluate and improve what AI produces. Consider professional certification in grant writing to build that foundation.

4. Build relationships. Don't let your first contact with a foundation be a proposal. Attend their events, engage with their content, and make connections. Relationship-based fundraising still works—even in an AI era.

5. Track your success rates by fit level. Are your "perfect fit" applications succeeding? If not, the problem isn't fit—it's proposal quality. Get help with grant writing training or hire an experienced consultant.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How can I tell if a foundation is a good fit for my organization?

A: Look at four key alignment factors: mission (do they fund exactly what you do?), geography (are you squarely in their funding area?), grant size (do they give grants at your level?), and grantee history (when you look at who they fund, do you belong on that list?). If you can't clearly articulate why you fit in all four areas, it's probably not worth applying.

Q: Should I never use AI for grant writing?

A: AI can be a powerful tool for experienced grant writers—it can help generate first drafts, organize information, and improve efficiency. The problem is using AI when you don't have the expertise to evaluate whether its output is good. Learn grant writing fundamentals first, then use AI to enhance your work.

Q: What if all the foundations in my area don't accept unsolicited proposals?

A: This is increasingly common. Your strategy shifts from "submit proposals" to "build relationships." Research foundations that align with your work, identify connections (board members, staff, funded organizations you know), and start relationship-building. Attend their events, engage with their content, and ask for informational conversations. The goal is to get invited to apply.

Q: How many grant proposals should I be submitting per year?

A: According to Grant Professionals Association data, grant professionals write a median of 19-20 proposals per year. Quality matters far more than quantity. It's better to submit 10 highly strategic, well-researched proposals than 50 generic ones.

Q: How do I know if my proposal is too generic?

A: Ask yourself: Could another organization in your field submit this exact same proposal by just changing the name? If yes, it's too generic. Strong proposals include specific data about your organization, concrete examples of your work, and clear evidence of why you're the right organization for this funder at this time.

Q: What's the difference between a strategic long-shot and spray-and-pray?

A: A strategic long-shot means you've identified a genuine connection between your work and the funder's priorities (even if it's not obvious), and you're willing to invest significant time building the relationship and crafting a targeted proposal. Spray-and-pray means sending essentially the same proposal to many funders, hoping something sticks, without strategic thinking about fit.

The Bottom Line

The landscape of foundation fundraising is changing. The doors are closing—not because foundations don't want to fund good work, but because they're overwhelmed with poor applications from organizations that haven't done the strategic thinking.

Strategic grant writing isn't just about writing better proposals. It's about making better decisions about where to invest your limited time. It's about knowing when to walk away from a poor-fit opportunity. It's about building relationships and demonstrating a genuine understanding of what funders care about.

If you're serious about foundation funding in 2026 and beyond, it's time to stop throwing applications at every foundation you find and start being strategic about fit.

The foundations that remain open to unsolicited proposals are looking for thoughtful, strategic applications from people who've done their homework.

Give them what they're looking for—and stop contributing to the problem that's closing doors for everyone.

Now I want to hear from you: Have you noticed foundations in your area closing to unsolicited proposals? Are you seeing AI-generated proposals flood your field? And honestly, where do you fall on the spray-and-pray to strategic spectrum? Share your experience in the comments.

References

Candid. (2024). How often do foundations accept unsolicited requests for funds? https://candid.org/blogs/do-foundations-accept-unsolicited-requests-for-funds-from-nonprofits/

Eisenberg, P. (2015, October 20). Let's require all big foundations to let more nonprofits apply for grants. Chronicle of Philanthropy.

Grant Professionals Association. (2023). 2023 GPA compensation and benefits survey. https://grantprofessionals.org/page/salarysurvey

Mika, G. (2024, December 5). Where do foundations stand on AI-generated grant proposals? Candid Insights. https://blog.candid.org/post/funders-insights-on-ai-generated-grant-application-proposals/

Smith, B. K. (2011). [Foundation Center research on unsolicited proposals]. Referenced in Nonprofit Quarterly. (2017, February 24). Scaling the wall: Getting your grant proposal heard. https://nonprofitquarterly.org/scaling-the-wall-getting-your-grant-proposal-heard/

The Taxonomy Tangle: Why Grant Database Categories Need Better Alignment

Fair warning: we're about to dive into something decidedly nerdy. But if you're a grant professional who has used multiple grant research databases and felt confused about the terminology differences, this matters more than you might think.

What's Taxonomy Got to Do With It?

In grant research databases, taxonomy is the classification system used to categorize funding opportunities. Think of it as the organizational framework that determines whether a grant for "community health education" gets filed under "health," "education," or "community development." A well-designed taxonomy acts as your search compass, helping you navigate efficiently toward relevant opportunities.

When database providers use different terminology and categorization schemes, grant professionals need to adjust their approach for each platform. What should be intuitive navigation becomes a translation exercise—like needing different lightbulbs for different lamps.  Each database illuminates the grant landscape, but you need to understand which "bulb" fits which "fixture" to get the best results.

The Great Divide: How Three Major Databases Categorize the Same World

To illustrate these challenges, let's examine my three favorite databases: Instrumentl, Foundation Directory Online by Candid (FDO), and GrantStation. I’ve used all three extensively and seen firsthand how their differences can cause confusion.

Each platform's taxonomy reflects different specializations. Instrumentl's categories are heavily weighted toward community services and sciences, reflecting its unique inclusion of research grants.  FDO's categories allow precise targeting and broader exploration. GrantStation's categories streamline groupings for intuitive navigation.

"Types of support" classifications reveal similar specializations. All three recognize fundamental categories like general operating and capital support, but their granularity differs. For example, Instrumentl’s "education/outreach" is FDO's "policy, advocacy and systems reform," and GrantStation’s "advocacy."

What Makes Each Database Special

·      Instrumentl takes a broader approach to avoid over-filtering opportunities classified differently by funders. It also includes scientific research grants and integrates project management capabilities alongside grant discovery.

·      FDO offers an extensive corporate foundation database, capturing corporate giving programs that often fly under the radar. It also features "regranting" and "participatory grantmaking" as specific support types, increasingly important funding mechanisms.

·      GrantStation includes giving circles as a funder category, Canadian funding opportunities alongside US sources, and events/sponsorships as a support category, valuable for conferences, galas, or community events funding. Their accessible pricing makes comprehensive grant research possible for smaller organizations.

A Call for Common Ground

Database providers have an opportunity to better serve the grant community by working toward greater taxonomic alignment. This doesn't require abandoning unique strengths—the goal is interoperability, not homogenization. In other words, coordination, not conformity. It’s not about being the same, it’s about working in sync.

Academic databases share subject headings, and library systems use common classification schemes. Coordination can enhance rather than diminish individual platform value. A shared taxonomy framework would allow grant professionals to develop transferable search expertise and conduct more comprehensive research without getting lost in terminological translation.

Honoring the Hunt

Grant professionals deserve recognition for the detective work they perform daily. They navigate not just the substance of grants, but the structural inconsistencies that make comprehensive research more challenging than it needs to be.

By acknowledging and addressing taxonomic disconnects, database providers can honor the expertise of grant professionals while making their essential work more efficient. Sometimes the most powerful changes happen not in the spotlight, but in the infrastructure that makes everything else possible.

Do you think database providers should collaborate on common taxonomy standards? How would you make the case that this helps the entire grant community?

Grants for Small Businesses: Your Essential Resource Guide

As grant writing experts, we often receive inquiries from entrepreneurs wondering, "Are there any grants out there for small businesses?" This is a vital question that reflects the hopes and dreams of countless small business owners striving to make their mark in the world.

 We understand the challenges you face, whether launching a new venture, expanding your existing business, or navigating unforeseen hurdles. In response, we've crafted this essential resource guide to help you uncover grant opportunities that could provide the support you need. Let’s dive in!

Tips for Small Businesses Applying for Grants 

1. Understand the Grant's Purpose: Before applying, make sure you clearly understand the objectives of the grant. Each grant program has specific goals, and aligning your project with these objectives can significantly enhance your chances of approval.

2. Read the Eligibility Requirements: Each grant has its own eligibility criteria. Carefully review these requirements to ensure your business qualifies before investing time in the application process.

3. Develop a Strong Proposal: Your grant proposal should be well-structured, clear, and compelling. Clearly outline your business plan, objectives, and how the grant funds will be utilized. Make sure to include specific details about the impact your project will have on your community or target market.

4. Provide Supporting Documentation: Many grant applications require additional documentation, such as financial statements, business plans, and letters of support. Gather and prepare these materials in advance to streamline the application process.

5. Follow the Instructions: Ensure that you adhere to all application guidelines, including formatting and submission requirements. Missing deadlines or failing to follow instructions can result in automatic disqualification.

6. Seek Feedback: Before submitting your application, consider seeking feedback from colleagues, mentors, or professionals in the field. A fresh perspective can help identify areas for improvement and enhance the overall quality of your proposal. For example, Spark the Fire offers a grant review service so you can get feedback on your final draft before you submit it.

7. Be Persistent: If your application is not successful, don’t be discouraged. Grant applications can be highly competitive. Use any feedback provided to improve future applications and keep looking for new opportunities. 

Available Grant Opportunities for Small Businesses

Navigating the world of grants can be challenging, but the opportunities available can make a significant difference in your business's growth and sustainability. Below, we present a sample of grants that can provide the financial support you need to take your business to the next level.

 1. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs
These federal grants are tailored for small businesses engaging in research and development, with a focus on innovative technologies. To be eligible, businesses must have fewer than 500 employees.

• Website: SBA SBIR/STTR

2. Grants.gov
This portal serves as a one-stop shop for federal grants across multiple agencies, allowing businesses to search and apply for various funding opportunities. Eligibility varies by grant.

• Website: Grants.gov

3. Hometown Heroes Grant Program
This program supports local businesses owned by first responders and veterans, providing funding to help these heroes thrive in their entrepreneurial endeavors. Eligibility depends on the state and target audience.

• Website: Check state-specific resources.

4. Comcast RISE Investment Fund
This program offers grants and marketing resources specifically for small businesses owned by people of color, aiming to enhance their visibility and growth. Eligible businesses must be owned by people of color.

• Website: Comcast RISE

5. Economic Development Administration (EDA) Grants
These grants support economic development initiatives that create jobs and promote business growth in various communities. Specific eligibility criteria depend on the grant.

• Website: EDA

6. The Awesome Foundation Grants
This initiative provides small grants for creative projects proposed by individuals or groups, encouraging innovation and community engagement. There are no specific eligibility requirements, making it accessible to a broad range of applicants.

• Website: Awesome Foundation

7. National Association for the Self-Employed (NASE) Growth Grants
NASE offers grants up to $4,000 for members to fund various business needs, supporting their growth and development. To be eligible, applicants must be members of NASE.

• Website: NASE

8. Rural Business Development Grants (RBDG)
This USDA program provides grants to support the development of small and emerging private businesses in rural areas. To qualify, businesses must be small and located in rural communities.

• Website: RBDG Program

9. Amazon Business: Small Business Grants
Amazon Business awards over $250,000 in monetary grants and prizes to support the growth of 15 small businesses. Existing Amazon Business small business customers based in the US with annual revenue of $1 million or less can apply for a grant, typically in May.

·       Website: Amazon Business Grants

10. Etsy Emergency Relief Fund
Etsy provides emergency relief grants to creative entrepreneurs when disasters disrupt their businesses. In partnership with CERF+, a nonprofit organization focused on helping artists prepare for and recover from emergencies and disasters, a disaster relief fund just for Etsy sellers was created. Grants are awarded quarterly to a select number of eligible sellers who have experienced a federally declared disaster within the past year as long as they’ve been active sellers on Etsy for at least one year and their accounts with Etsy are in good standing.

·       Website: Etsy Emergency Relief Fund

11. FedEx Small Business Grants
The FedEx Small Business Grants Program awards U.S.-based entrepreneurs with grants to enhance their businesses.

·       Website: FedEx Small Business Grants

12. IFundWomen
I Fund employs a universal grant application database as the first step in seeking funding.  When IFundWomen partners with a brand, they match the partner’s grant criteria to businesses in the database.

·       Website: IFundWomen

13. Quickbooks
Small business owners looking for support in running or growing their operations are awarded a $10,000 grant and three months of business coaching.

·       Website: Quickbooks Small Business Grants

14. Venmo
Venmo partners with Hello Alice and the Global Entrepreneurship Network to provide 10 small Venmo businesses with $20k each in direct funding. From expanding their workspaces to investing in new products, these funds help support small business owners as they grow their businesses to the next level.

Website: Venmo

15. The UPS Store
UPS's Small Biz Challenge offers competitive grants totaling $35K in prizes to grow your business, get featured in Inc. magazine, and access expert mentorship.

Website: UPS Small Biz Challenge

16. NASE- National Association for the Self-Employed Grants
Members of NASE can apply for NASE Growth Grants to receive up to $4K for their small business for marketing, advertising, hiring employees, expanding facilities, and other specific business needs.

Website: NASE

 Other Resources
Hello Alice: https://helloalice.com/funding/grants/.

 Conclusion

Understanding the landscape of grants can feel overwhelming, but you don’t have to go it alone. These funding opportunities are designed to support you and your business, whether you're looking to innovate, expand, or simply keep your doors open.

 If you’re ready to sharpen your grant-writing skills and unlock your business’s full potential, consider enrolling in our grant writing classes. Our courses are tailored to equip you with the tools and knowledge necessary to tackle the grant application process with confidence. Plus, we offer a wealth of resources to support you on your entrepreneurial journey. Don’t let these funding opportunities slip through your fingers—let’s empower your business together!

Do you have tips for small businesses seeking grants? Comment below and share your knowledge! We’d love to hear from you.

Discover Tribal Giving: Is Your State on the Map?

Tribal giving is as unique and varied as the tribes themselves. Each tribal nation operates as a sovereign entity, meaning they have distinct priorities, traditions, and methods of philanthropy. In some states, tribes generously support local charities, while others focus exclusively on education, health initiatives, or cultural preservation. Some tribes provide limited or no external funding, emphasizing their internal community needs.

For nonprofits, educational institutions, or local charities seeking funding, having a clear understanding of tribal giving practices in your state is critical to building the right connections and crafting thoughtful proposals.

Introducing the State-by-State Guide to Tribal Giving

To help you navigate this complex landscape, we’ve created an e-book: a state-by-state guide to tribal giving. This comprehensive resource provides valuable insights into the giving practices of tribes across the U.S., including:

• Specific funding priorities for tribes in each state.

• Guidance on which tribes accept external grant applications.

• Tips to build culturally sensitive, respectful, and impactful relationships.

Whether you're just beginning your journey into tribal philanthropy or looking to strengthen existing partnerships, this guide can help you identify opportunities and approach tribal giving with the respect and understanding it deserves.

Why Understanding Tribal Giving Matters

Tribal philanthropy is an underutilized and powerful resource for organizations. By aligning your mission with tribal priorities, you can create partnerships that not only secure funding but also contribute to meaningful community impact. However, approaching tribal funding requires careful preparation, cultural sensitivity, and a commitment to transparency and collaboration.

Get the Guide

Ready to explore tribal giving opportunities in your state? Download our exclusive e-book, “State-by-State Guide to Tribal Giving,” and take the next step in building impactful partnerships.

Should You Apply for Tribal Funding?

A question that often arises when discussing tribal philanthropy is whether organizations should be seeking funds from tribes, given the high levels of poverty and underfunded infrastructure within many Native American communities. It’s a valid concern and one that should be approached with respect and awareness of tribal sovereignty.

While many tribal nations face economic challenges, it’s important to remember that tribes are independent entities with their own economic systems and philanthropic priorities. Some tribes operate successful businesses and casinos, creating a surplus that allows them to engage in charitable giving. These tribes may choose to give back not only to their own communities but also to non-tribal organizations that align with their values.

However, not all tribes have the same capacity for giving, and some focus their efforts exclusively on supporting their own members. The key is to do thorough research on the tribes you're considering approaching for funding. Understanding their priorities and ensuring that your organization’s mission aligns with their values is critical to building a respectful and mutually beneficial relationship.

Tips for Applying to Tribal Funding

When applying for tribal funding, it's important to approach each grant application with attention to detail and respect for tribal culture. Here are some key tips to guide you through the process:

1. Grant Applications Vary Significantly
   Tribal grant applications can be quite different from one another. Some may ask for handwritten submissions, while others might require you to print sticker labels to place on corresponding attachments. Some applications are short and straightforward, while others request extensive details. The key is to carefully read and follow all instructions and guidelines to ensure your submission meets the requirements.

2. Emphasize Service to Native American Communities
   If your organization serves Native American populations, make sure to highlight this in your proposal. Quantify the impact your work has on these communities, and explain how the funding will further support Native American individuals or groups. This can strengthen your case, especially if your goals align with the tribe’s priorities.

3. Detail Existing Partnerships with Tribes
   If your organization is already collaborating with tribes or tribal entities, be sure to highlight these relationships in your grant application. Detailing successful partnerships and the positive outcomes of working with Native American communities shows that your organization is committed to fostering long-term, respectful connections.

4. Build Relationships First
   Just as with any funder, building a relationship with tribal nations before applying is crucial. Engage with the tribe, understand their values, and establish trust. Attend events, participate in community discussions, and show genuine interest in their mission. Building long-term, mutually beneficial partnerships often paves the way for successful funding opportunities.

5. Craft a Culturally Sensitive Proposal
   Your proposal should reflect respect and understanding of the tribe's culture. Use language that is thoughtful and free from stereotypes, and avoid one-size-fits-all templates. Tailor your proposal to align with the tribe’s values and ensure that it is sensitive to their cultural traditions.

6. Do Your Homework
   Research the tribe's giving priorities, funding history, and current focus areas. Each tribal nation has its own approach to philanthropy, so it’s important to understand what they value most in potential partnerships. Make sure your proposal reflects a deep understanding of their community and goals.

7. Focus on Community Impact
   Tribes often prioritize projects that benefit their community members directly. In your proposal, clearly outline how your project will positively impact the tribe or Native American populations in general. Emphasize mutual benefits and long-term partnerships that foster growth and collaboration.

8. Be Transparent and Accountable
   Clearly define your project’s objectives, how the funding will be used, and how success will be measured. Tribes value transparency and accountability, so regular updates and detailed reporting on the outcomes of the project can build trust for future opportunities.

9. Seek Feedback
   If your proposal is not accepted, ask for feedback. Tribes appreciate applicants who are open to learning and improving. Incorporating their feedback can strengthen your chances in future applications and demonstrate your respect for the process.

Closing Thoughts

Tribal giving represents a powerful and often underutilized resource for organizations across the country. By understanding the unique landscape in your state, you can open doors to partnerships that not only benefit your organization but also strengthen tribal communities.

What are your experiences with tribal philanthropy? Have you navigated these waters before, or are you just starting your journey? We’d love to hear your thoughts and stories in the comments below!

---

Want to learn more about grants research? We are hosting a week-long webinar series in January. Check it out!

And if you're looking for more support, Spark the Fire offers an array of resources to help you succeed. Whether you're interested in our Certificate in Grant Writing Course, need expert Consultation, or want to sharpen your skills with our Freelancer Template or Nonprofit Template Guide, we’re here to assist you every step of the way. Be sure to check out our job board and e-books like Action Verbs and All the Grant Questions to continue your growth in grant writing.

We’d love to hear from you! Have you had experience navigating tribal philanthropy or building partnerships with tribal nations? What insights or challenges have you encountered? Share your thoughts, questions, or success stories by typing into the comment box below!

Your perspective could inspire and guide others on their journey to understanding tribal giving. Let’s start a conversation and learn from each other’s experiences!